Core service 03

Machines watch. People decide.

Cameras alone miss intent. Guards alone miss everything they are not standing next to. Hybrid security layers AI detection, live operators and boots on the ground into one service — so the whole site is covered continuously, and a human is still the one making the call when it counts.

The trade-off, resolved

You were told to pick
one or the other.

Drag the divider. Each approach fails in a different place — which is exactly why we run both.

Traditional guard patrol
TRADITIONAL GUARDING ALONE

One person, one place, one moment

  • Covers only what one pair of eyes can reach
  • Predictable patrol routes are easy to time
  • Thousands per month, per post
  • Often little usable evidence afterwards
Hybrid AI and human security
HYBRID: AI + OPERATORS + GUARDS

Every metre, every minute, then a human

  • Whole site under detection continuously
  • No pattern to learn and no route to wait out
  • A fraction of the cost, nothing upfront
  • Court-admissible footage on every incident
DRAG TO COMPARE
How the layers stack

Four layers. Each one
catches what the
last one would have missed.

LAYER 01

AI detection

Analytics run on every camera continuously, separating people and vehicles from rain, wildlife and headlights. This layer never tires, never looks away and never takes a break at 4am — which is precisely when it earns its place.

Machine · always on
AI video analytics
LAYER 02

Human verification

A licensed officer in Vancouver looks at what the AI flagged and judges intent — the one thing software still gets wrong. A contractor arriving early and a person testing door handles look similar to an algorithm. They do not look similar to a trained operator.

Human · 24/7 operations centre
Operator verifying an alert
LAYER 03

Live voice intervention

The operator speaks through on-site speakers and describes the intruder by clothing and position. Being watched is theoretical; being named out loud is not. Most incidents end here, before anything is taken and before anyone is called out.

Human · remote, immediate
Two-way audio intervention
LAYER 04

Boots on the ground

When a site genuinely needs a physical presence — a lock-up, an escort, a confirmed break-in — guards and mobile patrols are dispatched to a verified incident with live direction from the operator watching it unfold.

Human · on site, on demand
Mobile patrol response
The economics

Why hybrid wins
on the invoice too.

A guard post prices by the hour, so coverage and cost rise together. Layered monitoring prices by the site, so more hours cost roughly nothing extra. That is the whole difference.

Indicative comparison for a mid-size BC commercial site. Your figures come from the free site visit — we quote on the actual property, not on an average.

Single guard post~12% of site
Mobile patrol, 4 visits/night~9% of hours
Unmonitored cameras0% prevented
Hybrid security100% of site, 100% of hours
Two guards, 24/7 coveragehighest
Single guard, nights onlyhigh
Mobile patrol contractmoderate
Hybrid securitylowest · $0 upfront
Side by side

What each model
actually delivers.

Capability Cameras only Guards only Hybrid
Whole site covered at once Partial No Yes
Someone watching in real time No While on shift 24/7
Intent judged by a human No Yes Yes
Deterrence before the loss No If nearby Live voice-down
Physical response on site No Yes Dispatched & directed
Court-admissible evidence If recorded well Rarely Every incident
Upfront equipment cost You buy it n/a $0
Cost of adding hours n/a Linear Flat
Questions

Before you ask.

Only for the hours that genuinely need a body on site — a lock-up, an escort, a confirmed break-in. The monitoring layers absorb the rest, which is where the saving comes from. Most sites move from continuous guarding to on-demand response and cut cost substantially without losing cover.
Yes. Where you have a guard provider you are happy with, we run the detection and verification layers and hand them verified, directed incidents instead of vague alarms. Their time then goes to incidents that are real.
It varies more by layout and risk profile than by size. A fenced yard with one entrance needs a very different mix from a multi-building campus. The free site visit exists to answer this, and we would rather specify fewer layers that hold than sell you four that overlap.
It depends on your location, and we will give you a realistic figure for your address rather than a marketing number. What matters more is that responders are sent to a confirmed, live incident with an operator describing what is happening — not to an unverified alarm that is usually nothing.
No. AI filters, humans decide. Analytics narrow thousands of frames down to the few worth a person's attention, and every escalation — voice-down, dispatch, police — is authorised by a licensed officer. Footage is handled under PIPEDA with logged access throughout.
Nothing upfront. Equipment, installation and calibration are carried by us, and you pay one flat monthly fee for the layers your site runs. The site visit and the plan are free whether or not you go ahead.
Free site visit · no obligation

Let's work out which
layers your site needs.

A certified consultant walks the property, maps the risk, and specifies the smallest combination of layers that genuinely covers it. Free, and no obligation.

ULC-S301 certified PIPEDA compliant Vancouver monitoring centre